3/17 Testimony - Chef John Van House| Core Foodservice 

3/17 Testimony - Noah Rosenberger| ProStart Alumni 
​

Read HF 1240/SF 1578 

Yesterday evening, the Senate Jobs and Economic Development Committe held the first hearing in weeks on Paid Family Medical Leave from 5:30PM – 9:00PM. The hearing was held because the fiscal note (cost of the program) is now available, which you can read below. 
 
During the hearing, several amendments were adopted that make changes to the bill. While we are working to best understand how they will impact the program, here are some highlights: 
 
Exempts seasonal employees: “Employee does not include seasonal employees who are employed for no more than 150 days during any consecutive 52-week period. A seasonal employee whose employment extends beyond 150 days during any consecutive 52-week period shall be considered an employee for the purposes of this chapter retroactively to the first day of employment.” 
 
Reduces maximum benefit to 20 weeks: “The total number of weeks that an applicant may take benefits in a single benefit year for a serious health condition is the lesser of 12 weeks, or 12 weeks minus the number of weeks within the same benefit year that the applicant received benefits for bonding, safety, or family care plus 8 weeks. The total number of weeks that an applicant may take benefits in a single benefit year for bonding, safety leave, or family care is the lesser of 12 weeks, or 12 weeks minus the number of weeks within the same benefit year that the applicant received benefits for a serious health condition plus 8 weeks.” 
 
Changes the 90 day provision: Clearly shifts 90 day provision to apply to job protection (not when you can take the leave. “Ninety days from the date of hire, an employee has a right and is entitled to reinstatement as provide under this subdivision for any day for which the employee has been deemed eligible for benefits under this chapter.” 
 
Small business wage exclusion: “For employers with fewer than 30 employees, the amount of wages upon which quarterly employer premium is required is reduced by the premium rate to be paid by the employer multiplied by the lessor of: 

• $12,500 multiplied by the number of employees; or 
• $120,000 
• For each employee over 20 employees, the exclusion is reduced by $12,000. The premium paid by the employer as a result of the reduction allowed under this subdivision must not be less than zero. The reduction in premiums paid by the employer is for the sole benefit of the employer and does not relieve the employer from deducting the employee portion of the premium.” 

 
Changes to business assistance grants: Allows employers to be eligible for business assistance grant when more than 15% of employees are receiving the benefits in any given week. The grant shall be equal to the lesser of: 25% of wages earned by the employees on leave in the most recent completed quarter divide by 13 or $300 per week per employee on leave. The grant must be used to hire temporary workers or to increase the wages for current employees. The grant is paid weekly. 
 
Actuarial study: Requires an independent actuarial study to be completed and reported on by October 31, 2023. The actuarial study must study the family and medical leave premium rate, premium rate structure, weekly benefit formula, duration of benefits, fund reserve and other components as necessary to determine an actuarially sound rate and future rate setting mechanism of the family and medical benefit insurance program. 
​

Wednesday, the Senate Jobs and Economic Development Committee heard SF2023, which establishes a one-time appropriation of $350,000 to develop an online hospitality training course, modeled after the South Dakota program. The bill also accounts for a $25,000 annual appropriation for ongoing maintenance. Senator Rich Draheim is chief author of the Hospitality Minnesota priority bill and a hospitality industry advocate. He highlighted the need to help build the hospitality workforce, as we are down around 15,000 workers. 
 
Hospitality Minnesota’s Liz Rammer lead off testimony; followed by Xinyi Qian (Director of University of Minnesota Extension Tourism Center) and Jason Subbert (TPI Hospitality). The bill was laid over for potential inclusion in the omnibus bill, which will likely be released next week.  ​

On Tuesday, Governor Walz, Speaker Hortman and Senate President Bobby Joe Champion announced the budget targets for the 2023 legislative session. Budget targets allow the House and Senate committees to start with a common goal as they pull together their omnibus budget bills over the weeks to come. That process already started this week with omnibus bill hearing beginning.
 
Key budget targets we are watching are: 
·     Taxes, aids and credits (net), $3 billion; 
·     Paid family medical leave, $668.3 million; 
·     Economic development, $250 million; 
·     Workforce development, $240 million; 
·     Earned sick and safe time, 4.8 million 
 
To read the complete list of budget targets and more information on the process, please refer to the Session Daily article below.  

Read House Session Daily Article on Budget Targets

On Wednesday, the House Property Tax Division heard HF1535, which would allow the City of Wayzata the authority to establish a 1% food and beverage tax on all restaurants and places of refreshment within the city. Hospitality Minnesota member, Laura Garcia, General Manager of The Hotel Landing, testified to raise concerns about the bill. There was committee discussion on the need for the tax; but ultimately the bill was laid over for potential inclusion in the omnibus bill. As a reminder, the Senate Taxes Committee has already heard the bill and laid the bill over for potential inclusion in the omnibus bill. This means that this proposed tax is “on the list” of the potential bills to be included in the final tax bill. Final negotiations on that bill will occur over the weeks to come.  
​

On Monday, the Senate Jobs and Economic Development Committee heard SF1794, which establishes additional one time appropriations for Explore Minnesota Tourism (EMT). Most importantly, it creates $10 million in one time tourism industry recovery grants, which can be used by entities across the state to attract conventions, events and meetings. Several testifiers – including Tourism for Growth Coalition, Meet Minneapolis, Congress of Minnesota Resorts, and Hospitality Minnesota – highlighted the positive impact the additional funds could provide to attract events and aid the tourism industry recovery. 
​

​On Tuesday, the House Labor and Industry Committee held the second hearing on the carbon monoxide bill, which would require every sleeping room in a hotel to have a carbon monoxide alarm. The author did amend the bill to include the inspection process in current fire code inspections conducted by the Minnesota State Fire Marshal. Hospitality Minnesota engaged legislators ahead of the hearing, explaining existing fire code requirements (which does require carbon monoxide detection around fuel-sources such as gas furnaces, water heaters and fireplaces). The committee deliberated on the implementation timeline, which, at this time, is anticipated to be August 1, 2023. 
 
The bill passed committee by a voice vote and is now eligible for a House floor vote. As a reminder, the Senate version of the bill is also eligible for a Senate floor vote. Hospitality Minnesota will continue to work with legislators to discuss the challenges to a short implementation timeline, especially supply chain challenges.
​

3/14 Testimony - Jill Sims | Hospitality Minnesota 

​Read HF 406/SF 225
​ 

On Thursday, the Senate Commerce Committee heard SF2319, which establishes driver protections for transportation network companies (Uber/Lyft). In last week’s hearing, food and package delivery was included. This week, Senator Fateh brought forward an amendment that removed food and package delivery from the bill – which we supported.
​
After crucial input from members on Thursday’s Advocacy Network call, Hospitality Minnesota’s Jill Sims testified on the bill to thank Senator Fateh for the removal of food and package delivery and raise additional concerns. The rideshare services have indicated that rides in the Twin Cities may cost 50% more than the same type of ride in New York City. This poses a significant challenge for hospitality workers who use the ride services, out of necessity, to get to and from work, as well as residents and travelers using the service to visit hospitality businesses. We will continue to work with Senator Fateh and other members to voice our concerns about the impact of the higher cost of rideshare.
 
The Senate Commerce Committee did not pass the bill; tabling it for additional work. The bill will next be heard in the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday morning.
​